From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Nov 27 10:56:18 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA05389 for isp-outgoing; Wed, 27 Nov 1996 10:56:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns2.harborcom.net (root@ns2.harborcom.net [206.158.4.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA05384 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 1996 10:56:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from swoosh.dunn.org (swoosh.dunn.org [206.158.7.243]) by ns2.harborcom.net (8.8.3/8.8.3) with SMTP id NAA27956; Wed, 27 Nov 1996 13:56:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 13:52:37 -0500 () From: Bradley Dunn Reply-To: Bradley Dunn To: John Capo cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Stupid question no 10101 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-X-Sender: bradley@harborcom.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 26 Nov 1996, John Capo wrote: > Quoting Bradley Dunn (bradley@dunn.org): > > > > Careful there. If you are in the US or Canada and you are using ssh in a > > commercial application, you must either have a license with RSA or buy a > > product that does. > > (such as F-secure http://www.datafellows.com/f-secure/) > > > > Not according to the way I read the license. From the end of > paragraph 2 of the rsraef2/doc/license.txt: > > Nothing in this paragraph prohibits you from using the > Program or any Application Program solely for internal > purposes on the premises of a business which is engaged in > revenue-generating activities. > > You can't sell it, or derive revenue from it, but you can use it. I guess it depends on how you define "solely for internal purposes". From "WHAT YOU CAN (AND CANNOT) DO WITH RSAREF": RSAREF, RSAREF applications, and services based on RSAREF applications may not be sold. How do you define services based on RSA? I would ask a lawyer, since a part of providing Internet services includes providing access to computers. If you use RSA to administer those computers is the service based on RSA? Maybe, maybe not. -BD