From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan  6 12:19:51 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0984616A4CE; Thu,  6 Jan 2005 12:19:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from daemon.li (daemon.li [213.203.244.86])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9C58F43D1F; Thu,  6 Jan 2005 12:19:50 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from josef@daemon.li)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
  (uid 1000)
  by daemon.li with local; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:19:49 +0000
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:19:49 +0000
From: Josef El-Rayes <josef@FreeBSD.org>
To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de>
Message-ID: <20050106121948.GA7848@daemon.li>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0501060218130.23976@rfhpc8317>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0501060218130.23976@rfhpc8317>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:31:35 +0000
cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.org
cc: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 beats FreeBSD 5.3 in server performance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:19:51 -0000

Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de>:

[...]

> The results indicate that NetBSD=20
> has surpassed FreeBSD in performance on nearly every benchmark and=20
> is poised to grab the title of the best operating system for the=20
> server environment.''

I think this is a conclusion drawn too early when there has not been
any comparison of each SMP implementation.
No one runs a toaster as a server environment.

greets, josef
--=20
Josef El-Rayes                   (__)
Email:	  josef@daemon.li     \\\'',)=20
Web:	  http://daemon.li/     \/  \ ^
FreeBSD   Security Team         .\._/_)