From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Oct 14 17:14:40 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA07961 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 14 Oct 1996 17:14:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from w2xo.pgh.pa.us (w2xo.pgh.pa.us [206.210.70.5]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA07956 for ; Mon, 14 Oct 1996 17:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from durham@localhost) by w2xo.pgh.pa.us (8.6.12/8.6.9) id UAA05743; Mon, 14 Oct 1996 20:17:41 -0400 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 0.5-alpha [p0] on FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199610140756.JAA04798@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 20:14:17 -0400 (EDT) Organization: Very little From: Jim Durham To: (Joerg Wunsch) Subject: consoles and boot blocks Cc: J Wunsch , (FreeBSD hackers) Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On 13:56:37 J Wunsch opined: >>As Jim Durham wrote: >> Does the console have to be on sio0 ? How does one >> specify which com port if not ? > >The location, the speed, and the line behaviour (local line, modem >signals not obeyed) is hardcoded in the bootblocks and in the kernel >(sio.c, if i'm not mistaken). So yes, unless you wanna patch all >this, it's hardcoded to sio0 and 9600 Bd. This brings up a related topic.. Did we arrive at a final determination as to how to run a non-VGA monitor on the virtual terminals? This topic really got a lot of conversation going about a month ago and then just died out...I believe without any real resolution. -Jim Durham