Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 10:33:53 +0100 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: ports@freebsd.org, thomas.sander@gmx.de Subject: Re: why kdbg hasn't been upgraded? Message-ID: <CADLo839UbgRCR3U69-noHJv9yoRGkS8vApKNCjoajt=HSbpNxA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAP1CFxpVq9rneSRcayaFJr%2BbXS_hB-CT1356BkyaVbJ52C8Sew@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAA96eVtLSLipErNOCotjg1Z65rLNv97hQsYrpRy3GH0SaUCS=w@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo83_Wh54BgbZQc46BF5qv=Y06CrWWjj_FbKLF7npLNZ1nOA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP1CFxpVq9rneSRcayaFJr%2BbXS_hB-CT1356BkyaVbJ52C8Sew@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Reply from maintainer. On 10 Aug 2012 11:12, "Thomas Sander" <thomas.sander@gmx.de> wrote: > Hello, > > It has no reason why the version is so old. You can submit a PR. > > B.R. > Thomas > > 2012/8/10 Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> > >> Copying in maintainer. >> On 10 Aug 2012 10:42, "HU Dong" <itechbear@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> kdbg has been upgraded to 2.5.1 with qt4 library, while the port >>> devel/kdbg is still 2.2.0 with qt3 library. I modified the port a >>> little and had it successfully built. Is there any reason that it >>> should stay with the older version? If not, I'll submit a PR. >>> >>> B.R. >>> HU Dong >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >>> >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo839UbgRCR3U69-noHJv9yoRGkS8vApKNCjoajt=HSbpNxA>