From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 16 07:32:44 2012
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03564106566B;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:32:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2C58FC0A;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:32:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0G7WhiB050362;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:32:43 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from bapt@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0G7Wh7V050357;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:32:43 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to
	bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:32:39 +0100
From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20120116073239.GB4729@azathoth.lan>
References: <201201141921.q0EJLpcM094082@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<4F135DFF.7050903@FreeBSD.org> <4F13D231.8060703@FreeBSD.org>
	<4F136F25.6000402@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F136F25.6000402@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	miwi@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils Makefile ports/sysutils/tzdialog
 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 07:32:44 -0000


--tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 04:28:21PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 01/15/2012 23:30, Martin Wilke wrote:
> > On Sun Jan 15 23:15:11 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> When adding things to ports that duplicate base functionality it is
> >> customary to say how they are better than what we already have. :)
> >
> > As usual Patch are welcome :).
>=20
> Yeah, that completely doesn't answer my question. You were the one who
> committed this port. Can you please explain why?
>=20
> Thanks,
>=20
> Doug
>=20

1/ because submitter proposed it to the ports tree, since when are we juging
when should go in or not (if maintained) when dealing with port?

2/ because it adds feature tzsetup doesn't have like the Xdialog version?

4/ some people creating their own install media are happy to be able to pic=
k it
=66rom the ports

5/ people are now able to easily test/compare both tzsetup/tzdialog which m=
ight
help if tzdialog is to be proposed directly in base.

Do we really need more reasons ?

regards,
Bapt

--tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk8T0pcACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwBoACfeBVt9Xd6l9aAEh+MvT7XNrfM
av8An3dA3IHBiOWvKMdWDmD+N/Hi1R6H
=s+3y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye--