From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat May 6 11:50:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BD637B8C3; Sat, 6 May 2000 11:50:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA06513; Sat, 6 May 2000 12:50:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA18384; Sat, 6 May 2000 12:50:04 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate) Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 12:50:04 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200005061850.MAA18384@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mike Smith Cc: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams), hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [OT] Finding people with GSM phones (was Re: GPS heads up ) In-Reply-To: <200005061855.LAA07340@mass.cdrom.com> References: <200005061840.MAA18274@nomad.yogotech.com> <200005061855.LAA07340@mass.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > With one tower, you're down to describing an arc along which > > > the phone is probably located; still pretty good when it comes to finding > > > someone. > > > > He seemed to imply that they could get it within 25m, even with one > > phone. Like I said, I don't understand how, but I didn't question his > > ability. Plus, he knows alot more about the stuff than I do. > > Well, assuming they have 100% antenna overlap (not unlikely) you could > just do phase comparisons between the antennae getting the squirt. If > these guys are as smart as you say (and I have no doubt at all about > that), 25m at near distance is probably not unrealistic. True. Up close, you can triangulate. > Ask him if they can still do it at 35km out (the outer limit for a normal > GSM cell). That'd really spook me. 8) He wasn't interested in talking about it when I started asking about single cell towers, so I never pressed him on the issue. Maybe he was afraid that the 100m accuracy claim would be found out to be un-doable, but the Feds claim 'it must be that accurate', and they aren't interested in spending the $$ for GPS receivers in the handhelds. Or, he's got it figured out, and is applying for a patent on it and didn't want to reveal his secrets. :) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message