From owner-freebsd-current Tue Feb 11 19: 8:40 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA4A37B401 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 19:08:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0661443F93 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 19:08:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1C38YXv085918; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 19:08:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h1C38Y0Q085917; Tue, 11 Feb 2003 19:08:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 19:08:34 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Wesley Morgan Cc: leafy , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GCC 3.2.2 import -- questions Message-ID: <20030212030834.GA85905@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20030210204245.E86987@volatile.chemikals.org> <20030211021458.GA18597@leafy.idv.tw> <20030211221139.GA8670@hellraiser.andersa.net> <20030212013800.GA68983@leafy.idv.tw> <20030211210240.M91727@volatile.chemikals.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030211210240.M91727@volatile.chemikals.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:03:28PM -0500, Wesley Morgan wrote: > On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, leafy wrote: > > > > > > > Anders > > Yes I noticed it this morning too. > > The funny thing is that. If you use a non-P4 optmized GCC to compile lcms with P4 opt, then it passes the test. But with a P4 opted GCC, it borks. Looks like P4 opted GCC itself is bogus. > > That's odd. Does the FreeBSD build skill the stage2 compiler "rebuild"? I > thought the gcc build process tested itself against itself. > From personal observations, I would not use -march=p4 with gcc 3.2.x on my FreeBSD system. You're just asking for trouble. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message