From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 31 09:05:57 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72975142
 for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 09:05:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rdsmtp.iglou.com (rdsmtp.iglou.com [192.107.41.63])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB6D1093
 for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 09:05:56 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iglou.com;
 s=alpha; 
 h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Subject:cc:To:From:Date;
 bh=k/Avh4DHgbTjN6Czv2jgqgtug9s9EXINiHkLwUuO8rM=; 
 b=QGWD7n0ZdqwVPwEfTcM8UGLFQzlBHalGnL+nvI1D8WX3mT0ZrdyQ7I794N3cRHJXRuRG4xSlDxXYEa9wymxcS20hmz0GWsdRM5d6XZUKIFxMrTNQUJZfp65NvQBPdLqNC/8NcitMUamfllPyrzfJWph4Vn52D6UrRhQMpOGTsJs=;
Received: from iglou2.iglou.com ([192.107.41.8]:63646 helo=mail.iglou.com)
 by rdsmtp.iglou.com with esmtpa (Exim MTA/8.19.3)
 (envelope-from <levitch@iglou.com>)
 id 1VxvGo-0005rD-9G by authid <igloumta> with igloumta_auth
 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 04:05:50 -0500
Received: from shell1.iglou.com ([192.107.41.17]:38304 helo=shell1)
 by mail.iglou.com with esmtps (TLS cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
 (Exim MTA/8.19.3) (envelope-from <levitch@iglou.com>)
 id 1VxvGn-0000uF-5Q; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 04:05:49 -0500
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 04:05:48 -0500 (EST)
From: Darrel <levitch@iglou.com>
X-X-Sender: levitch@shell1
To: Milan Obuch <bsd@dino.sk>
Subject: Re: serial card on RC2 , RC3
In-Reply-To: <20131227234818.194e03c4@zeta.dino.sk>
Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.2.00.1312310358100.10882@shell1>
References: <alpine.GSO.2.00.1312271114020.26196@shell1>
 <20131227181326.GA88638@in-addr.com>
 <alpine.GSO.2.00.1312271338250.4737@shell1>
 <20131227201342.08842077@zeta.dino.sk>
 <alpine.GSO.2.00.1312271544040.17149@shell1>
 <20131227215252.6c3c856e@zeta.dino.sk>
 <20131227220411.7535cdbd@zeta.dino.sk>
 <alpine.GSO.2.00.1312271721080.27617@shell1>
 <20131227234818.194e03c4@zeta.dino.sk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Originating-IP: 192.107.41.17
X-IgLou-Customer: 3cb6f76205bd20f518810676a67a982b
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 09:05:57 -0000


> [ snip ]

>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- pucdata.c   2013-10-23 22:51:08.000000000 +0200
>>>>>> +++ pucdata.c.mod       2013-12-27 20:09:36.000000000 +0100
>>>>>> @@ -1094,6 +1094,12 @@
>>>>>>            PUC_PORT_2P, 0x10, 4, 0,
>>>>>>        },
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +       {   0x9710, 0x9922, 0xffff, 0,
>>>>>> +           "NetMos NM9922 Dual UART",
>>>>>> +           DEFAULT_RCLK,
>>>>>> +           PUC_PORT_2S, 0x10, 4, 0,
>>>
>>> Anyway, could you change this line to 'PUC_PORT_2S, 0x10, 0, 0,' and
>>> try again? I found this chip in NetBSD sources with this

With 'PUC_PORT_2S, 0x10, 0, 0,' 4 devices appeared.  I can connect to all 
of them with the 'kermit' application.  When I tried to pass traffic to a 
Cisco switch there was no response from the terminal.

> I managed to get a datasheet from ASIX, so if my wild shots are not the
> right ones (I feel the one with 'PUC_PORT_1S, 0x10, 4, 0,' is the best
> candidate), we can work at it then. But first try this modification (at
> the time comfortable to you - I do not urge you, I am just curious
> whether I am right with my guess :) ).
>

Hi, Milan.

'PUC_PORT_1S, 0x10, 4, 0,' did not produce devices.  'PUC_PORT_2S, 0x10, 
0, 0,' makes devices and perhaps I am missing something like a 
/boot/device.hints entry or should add 'comm multiport' back into the 
kernel.

Darrel