From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Oct 1 07:09:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA23074 for freebsd-emulation-outgoing; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 07:09:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from manchester.genrad.com (x227.genrad.co.uk [195.99.3.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA23062 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 07:09:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from swindellsr@genrad.co.uk) Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 07:09:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199810011409.HAA23062@hub.freebsd.org> Received: from CDP275.uk.genrad.com by manchester.genrad.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.0.1460.8) id T6JPGTZG; Thu, 1 Oct 1998 15:09:18 +0100 From: Robert Swindells To: cracauer@cons.org CC: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <19981001150310.A7259@cons.org> (message from Martin Cracauer on Thu, 1 Oct 1998 15:03:10 +0200) Subject: Re: Linux /proc/*/maps emulation Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >I don't know enough about linking to proceed. It's a fifo, but I don't >know what is connected to the other end. The kernel - why? ld.so? If >so, why can Linux ld.so work in FreeBSD's Linux emulation that has no >procfs/*/maps My guess would be that ld.so doesn't need to know where it got mmapped to, the shlib code just calls mmap for each of the libraries and they get loaded in. Robert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message