From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar 30 01:52:43 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6BDFF38
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 01:52:43 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from ml@my.gd)
Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com
 [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614BD769
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 01:52:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id z13so662451lbh.41
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=google.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
 :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
 bh=FXp7dsiK7Ht7gPtlDIe4/7vtiE2hvxv7IIKaj7KrGYw=;
 b=cLKxacY+EKdynwjwvaar3H2g6r2qnxWopss9zkFWhzJoyVma0VtplEWA8vVsAg3rRa
 r6Izgp3x24T2LFacRh2yeIWWPpcYPlEdcIwdLVw0aY2jrdyl21CrFE6aAFVqiw60pBaH
 BvutnbD3xHIqUYceopwi+KbfTRuIS7rkL6WuQpQwOIBt/D9k5F3/slpLK27LBvKJ5j/N
 xAqjhZ1yPoAaf23eWXX4eo57SRGgKzdJqom7OnqfP5e4naRzVSIOsruKlHBz990rmeBo
 SSAtieioRKe0nNiWkts7NgsPK94ayJbxfO6bbC6lczE3xweMCRValAA5uXX+YSjlyjGD
 yHsA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.150.4 with SMTP id ue4mr2238257lbb.28.1364608361684;
 Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.144.104 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:52:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <515607C1.2010701@drenet.info>
References: <515607C1.2010701@drenet.info>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 02:52:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CAE63ME5cqf_AOUFrZ=WyUDf1OR92HCxQL3iNJXCAOUKhMW26Xw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proper way to update ports with svn
From: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd>
To: Andre Goree <andre@drenet.info>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnGQyEHrHaHvKXRE6Zc8k4+eSv9JF2v6MLRxCV9fNUT5pVqGLcFi1vvFO56ChkZ1adSpZ1R
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 01:52:43 -0000

On 29 March 2013 22:29, Andre Goree <andre@drenet.info> wrote:

> I seem to have to run 'make index' in /usr/ports after I've run 'svn up
> /usr/ports' in order to see which ports need to be updated using
> 'portversion'.  This doesn't seem correct...and if so portsnap would
> seem like a much better tool.  Perhaps I should be running 'make
> fetchindex' instead?  I'm sure I've read about the correct way to do so,
> but it doesn't appear to be here:
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsSubversionPrimer
>
> Thanks in advance for any advice.
>

'make index' looks good to me, it's the right way to do things imo.

What bothers you, following 'make index', pkg version output seems dodgy ?