Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 20:31:29 +0200 From: cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws> To: Glenn Dawson <glenn@antimatter.net> Cc: Lei Sun <lei.sun@gmail.com>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disk fragmentation, <0%? Message-ID: <20050816183129.GB1352@epia2.farid-hajji.net> In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20050814131957.10dd4160@cobalt.antimatter.net> References: <d396fddf050813235443c72213@mail.gmail.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050814000146.0535bb50@cobalt.antimatter.net> <20050814191842.GA1358@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> <6.1.0.6.2.20050814131957.10dd4160@cobalt.antimatter.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 01:30:41PM -0700, Glenn Dawson wrote: > From the original message: > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ar0s1e 248M -278K 228M -0% /tmp > > This shows that /tmp is empty. If the reserved space was being encroached > upon, it would show > 100% capacity, and available bytes would go negative, > not bytes used. > > It would look something like this: > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ad0s1a 248M 238M -10M 105% / > > I've never seen the capacity go negative before, which is why I suggested > someone else might know the answer. Ups, yes, that's really weird. It's so unusual that I didn't notice it the first time. Could that be some counter overflowing? > -Glenn Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050816183129.GB1352>