Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 17:59:28 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> To: FreeBSD ARM <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svnlite segfaults a lot Message-ID: <87CAF73D-A744-472D-B9B0-BA2E5B2B8158@kientzle.com> In-Reply-To: <20140702092041.716a7413@bender.lan> References: <201407010930.s619Uk9X006689@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20140702092041.716a7413@bender.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 2, 2014, at 1:20 AM, Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:30:46 +0100 (BST) > Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk> wrote: >=20 >> # uname -a >> FreeBSD raspberry-pi 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r267801: >> Tue Jun 24 11:03:28 UTC 2014 >> root@grind.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/arm.armv6/usr/src/sys/RPI-B arm >>=20 >> I'm trying to pull the ports tree to rasp. pi model B. >> svnlite up (or co) segfaults after pulling 1-5 MB. >> Is this expected? >>=20 >> I'm powering via a bench power supply, so I can >> monitor the current. It is only about 400mA, >> occasionally raising to maybe 450mA. >> So my earlier suspicion, that an inadequate >> power was to blame, was wrong. >>=20 >> Anybody else seeing svnlite segfaults? >=20 > Yes, however I never tracked it down. I found svn from ports to work = as > expected. It wasn=92t this way a month or two ago when I used it last. But I tried just now and it=92s pretty bad. Trying to check out http://svn.freebsd.org/base/head segfaults after a thousand or so items (not always at the same point). Of course, gdb doesn=92t seem to be able to make any sense of the core file: $ gdb /usr/bin/svnlite ... (gdb) core svnlite.core =85 loading many symbols ... (gdb) bt #0 0x0008dbac in ?? () (gdb) =85 Trying to =93run update=94 from inside GDB immediately hits SIGILL in _rtld_get_stack_prot() Tim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87CAF73D-A744-472D-B9B0-BA2E5B2B8158>