From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 15 17:38:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.144.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2643F37B945 for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 17:38:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e4G0cjK63600; Mon, 15 May 2000 17:38:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 17:38:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: James Howard Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: utmpx, this is gonna hurt... In-Reply-To: <200005151955.PAA03468@rac1.wam.umd.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 15 May 2000, James Howard wrote: > How about adding the utmpx as required by SUSV2? It would make writing > programs that need to talk to utmp/utmpx a lot simpler. Yes? No? As usual, patches speak louder than words :) Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message