From owner-freebsd-mobile  Tue May  2 20: 6:37 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6538037B7DC; Tue,  2 May 2000 20:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA17934;
	Tue, 2 May 2000 21:06:31 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id VAA28525; Tue, 2 May 2000 21:06:14 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <200005030306.VAA28525@harmony.village.org>
To: Matt Peterson <matt@peterson.org>
Subject: Re: 3Com's all-in-one XJack modem/NIC 
Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 01 May 2000 21:34:22 PDT."
		<Pine.BSF.4.21.0005012128270.67282-100000@aphex.peterson.org> 
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005012128270.67282-100000@aphex.peterson.org>  
Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 21:06:14 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005012128270.67282-100000@aphex.peterson.org> Matt Peterson writes:
: when can we expect 4.0-RELEASE PAO floppies?).  Thx.

There are no current plans for a PAO based on 4.0.  Instead, the
strategy has been to integrate the PAO 3x stuff into -current and then
MFC as appropriate into 4.x stable.

This is just my understanding of things.  I could be wrong.  My
Japanese isn't that good :-)

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message