From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb  9 12:58:59 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F01614
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sat,  9 Feb 2013 12:58:59 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F9894C
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sat,  9 Feb 2013 12:58:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <pi@opsec.eu>) id 1U4A1B-00039u-2b
 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 13:58:57 +0100
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 13:58:57 +0100
From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@opsec.eu>
To: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Intel 82574 issue reported on Slashdot
Message-ID: <20130209125856.GX8239@home.opsec.eu>
References: <CMM.0.91.0.1360397743.bygg@mail.cafax.se>
 <51163E5B.7070602@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51163E5B.7070602@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 12:58:59 -0000

Hi!

> We don't even have the tool tcpreplay in the ports mentioned in that BLOG.

net-mgmt/tcpreplay is not the same ?

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         7 years to go !