Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 22:10:05 +0100 From: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch to improve mutex collision performance Message-ID: <20020221221005.A78243@energyhq.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20020221014909.A13952@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 01:49:09AM -0800 References: <200202181912.g1IJCGK32122@apollo.backplane.com> <20020218114326.A98974@dragon.nuxi.com> <200202181951.g1IJpip33604@apollo.backplane.com> <20020218153807.E96115@locore.ca> <20020221111915.N65817@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20020221014909.A13952@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 01:49:09AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
I'm not a commiter, but here comes my very humble opinion...
> Users of Perforce are starting to force the rest of us to learn and use
> it. That is totally not acceptable for the general FreeBSD population.
This argument is pretty weak, learning perforce takes 15-20 minutes.
> Those that chose to use it because they feel the tool is useful for
> THEMSELVES are of course free to use it. HOWEVER, Perforce is NOT the CM
> system of the FreeBSD project. Thus users of Perforce are expected to
> share their bits via posting patches, not forcing everyone to pull them
> out of the Perforce depot.
Well, if all developers started using p4, things would be easier and work
better in the long term. p4 is lightyears ahead of cvs, and, from what
I've read in this thread, developers are not exactly happy with cvs now,
as it's limitations have become evident.
So, why not give it a try?
Just my 0.02 Eur
Cheers,
--=20
Miguel Mendez - flynn@energyhq.homeip.net
GPG Public Key :: http://energyhq.homeip.net/files/pubkey.txt
EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk
FreeBSD - The power to serve!
--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8dWIsnLctrNyFFPERAjCTAJ9nPXRh8rDDpiM1oH03IVrE90uTFwCfVE4E
n3is7f7nk26i3JEjKywBD2E=
=2UCW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020221221005.A78243>