From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 21 21:31:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D975CAD1; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 21:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A5DBDC9; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 21:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tom.home (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t2LLV704031123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 21 Mar 2015 23:31:07 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 kib.kiev.ua t2LLV704031123 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t2LLV76Z031120; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 23:31:07 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 23:31:07 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov To: "Ivan A. Kosarev" Subject: Re: Use of chunksize before initialization Message-ID: <20150321213106.GV2379@kib.kiev.ua> References: <550C27D8.2010105@ivan-labs.com> <20150321010218.GD2379@kib.kiev.ua> <550D37DA.7060105@ivan-labs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <550D37DA.7060105@ivan-labs.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on tom.home Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ed Maste X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 21:31:16 -0000 On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:20:26AM +0200, Ivan A. Kosarev wrote: > > On 03/21/2015 03:02 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 03:59:52PM +0200, Ivan A. Kosarev wrote: > >> #12 0x00000008011b428d in malloc_init_hard () at jemalloc_jemalloc.c:698 > >> #13 malloc_init () at jemalloc_jemalloc.c:296 > >> #14 0x0000000801243ea2 in ?? () from /lib/libc.so.7 > >> #15 0x00000008006a5400 in ?? () > >> #16 0x000000080089e5b0 in ?? () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > >> #17 0x00007fffffffe0b0 in ?? () > >> #18 0x0000000801139d06 in _init () from /lib/libc.so.7 > >> #19 0x00007fffffffe0b0 in ?? () > > The backtrace is strange. Did you compiled malloc with the debugging > > symbols, while keep rest of libc without -g ? > > I've just added the -g flag to CC_FLAGS in the Makefile and made sure to > install an unstripped version of the .so . I could investigate more on > why the early calls omit debug symbols, if it does any matter. I want to understand at what stage of the initialization the access happens. This is why I want to see the complete backtrace.