From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 15 04:15:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951BC16A41F; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 04:15:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from softweyr.homeunix.net (cpe-66-75-60-23.san.res.rr.com [66.75.60.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F5143D45; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 04:15:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from [204.68.178.34] (gulliver [204.68.178.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by softweyr.homeunix.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9F4F7dD058354 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:15:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@opensail.org) In-Reply-To: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> References: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Wes Peters Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:15:07 -0700 To: Norikatsu Shigemura X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734) Cc: tux@pinguru.net, wes@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org, mitsuru@riken.jp, sugimura@jp.FreeBSD.ORG, rtdean@cytherianage.net, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, past@ebs.gr Subject: Re: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 04:15:30 -0000 On Oct 14, 2005, at 5:14 PM, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > Hi eclipse and eclipse related ports maintainers and users! > > Some time ago, someone suggested that eclipse and eclipse > related ports should be located on proper categories. I > think so. So I suggest following repocopy list. Anyone, > do you have any idea? > > java/eclipse -> devel/eclipse > java/eclipse-EPIC -> editors/eclipse-EPIC > java/eclipse-cdt -> editors/eclipse-cdt > java/eclipse-checkstyle -> devel/eclipse-checkstyle > java/eclipse-clay-core -> databases/eclipse-clay-core > java/eclipse-devel -> devel/eclipse-devel > java/eclipse-emf -> devel/eclipse-emf > java/eclipse-examples -> devel/eclipse-examples > java/eclipse-gef -> graphics/eclipse-gef > java/eclipse-gef-examples -> graphics/eclipse-gef-examples > java/eclipse-langpack -> devel/eclipse-langpack > java/eclipse-log4e -> devel/eclipse-log4e > java/eclipse-lomboz -> devel/eclipse-lomboz > java/eclipse-pmd -> devel/eclipse-pmd > java/eclipse-quantum -> databases/eclipse-quantum > java/eclipse-sqlexplorer -> databases/eclipse-sqlexplorer > java/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat -> www/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat > java/eclipse-uml -> devel/eclipse-uml > java/eclipse-v4all -> devel/eclipse-v4all > java/eclipse-vep -> devel/eclipse-vep > java/eclipse-vep-examples -> devel/eclipse-vep-examples > java/eclipse-viplugin -> editors/eclipse-viplugin > java/eclipseme -> devel/eclipseme > java/phpeclipse -> editors/phpeclipse > I don't mind moving the eclipse ports from java to devel, but all the other eclipse ports are add-ins to eclipse and should probably be classified along with eclipse. In particular, if eclipse is a 'devel' tool, I don't see how CDT and phpeclipse are editors. GEF isn't a graphics library, it's a graphical emulation framework for eclipse, which is (again) a development tool. -- Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket? Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com