From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 17 22:12:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7234A16A4DE for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:12:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr (smtp1-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1316443D4C for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:12:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (tataz.chchile.org [82.233.239.98]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2747B90B3B for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:12:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from obiwan.tataz.chchile.org (unknown [192.168.1.25]) by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B249B5F0 for ; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:13:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obiwan.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9D166405B; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:13:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:13:07 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20060817221307.GG57815@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Cc: Subject: no kld in minidumps X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:12:27 -0000 Hi, my laptop has just triggered a bug in the iwi(4) driver. I called doadump() from DDB prompt and was happily surprised to see that only 167 MB of memory where dumped, instead of 1 GB. Unfortunately once I have rebooted, I went into kgdb and asked for the backtrace, which look pretty accurate until it reached the iwi(4) functions, which was loaded from multiuser mode. I know this is iwi(4) because I saw the backtrace in DDB. Is it the desired behaviour, not yet implemented, or am I only missing something ? Thank you for your help. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >