From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 18:22:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAAD16A4E2 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:22:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from mail.kuban.ru (mail.kuban.ru [62.183.66.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1703D43D45 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:22:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru ([83.239.48.165]) by mail.kuban.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id k7KILho3077466; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:21:54 +0400 (MSD) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GEruW-0000CP-LA; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:20:36 +0400 To: Paul Mather References: <1156096970.19717.12.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:20:36 +0400 In-Reply-To: <1156096970.19717.12.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> (Paul Mather's message of "Sun, 20 Aug 2006 14:02:50 -0400") Message-ID: <69990395@bsam.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Boris Samorodov Cc: Divacky Roman , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linuxulator: syscall statfs64 not implemented? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:22:10 -0000 CCing to Roman as he may be interested. On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 14:02:50 -0400 Paul Mather wrote: > Since updating my -CURRENT system circa 16th August I'm getting an error > like this when my daily Tivoli backup runs: > Aug 20 02:18:50 zappa kernel: linux: pid 768 (dsmc): syscall statfs64 not implemented Thanks for the report. I think Roman knows what to do. ;-) > I don't know whether this is a -CURRENT problem or a problem with > linux_base-fc4, but I lean towards the former because the same nightly > backup setup I'm running on a 6.1-STABLE system runs without problems. The issue belongs only to -CURRENT. > I recall a discussion about merging Linux 2.6 kernel support into HEAD > around the time I updated. Could this be related to that? Here is what > I have for my Linux compat sysctls: > compat.linux.oss_version: 198144 > compat.linux.osrelease: 2.4.2 > compat.linux.osname: Linux This is related to the latest changes at linux emulation code, but not related to 2.6 Linux support (as you see, the default is 2.4). BTW, which platform do you use? (i.e. uname -srm) > Is anyone else having this "syscall statfs64 not implemented" problem? WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve