From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 20 21:30:15 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A6416A4CE
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:30:15 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2640C43D1F
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:30:15 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1KLUE6C094041
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:30:15 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1KLUEpW094040;
	Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:30:14 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:30:14 GMT
Message-Id: <200502202130.j1KLUEpW094040@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEvDtm5pZw==?= <bjoern.koenig@alpha-tierchen.de>
Subject: RE: conf/74004: [PATCH] add fam support to inetd.conf
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEvDtm5pZw==?= <bjoern.koenig@alpha-tierchen.de>
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:30:15 -0000

The following reply was made to PR conf/74004; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIEvDtm5pZw==?= <bjoern.koenig@alpha-tierchen.de>
To: "'Jose M Rodriguez'" <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es>
Cc: <freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>
Subject: RE: conf/74004: [PATCH] add fam support to inetd.conf
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:28:27 +0100

 Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
 
 > with this logic, why we distribute an /etc/inetd.conf? all=20
 > the entries are commented out.
 
 It wasn't logic; just an opinion. It's contestable. You didn't provide =
 logic either, because you claimed that fam is widely used, therefore =
 let's add an default line to inetd.conf. I suppose this is much more =
 true as long as we refer to libfam, but this use doesn't require inetd. =
 Whatever. I think that adding an appropriate line to inetd.conf won't =
 hurt as much as don't do it, but I agree with you that fam is a good =
 candidate for being added to inetd.conf at this time.
 
 > And is less error prone uncomment a line that copy and paste=20
 > while preserve tabs.
 
 It doesn't matter, because spaces are are valid seperators too.
 
 Regards Bj=C3=B6rn