From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 26 18:36:25 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A46CCC36C4 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A029EBE for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 76594CC36C2; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7591ACC36C0; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E47FBEBC; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from [192.168.100.100] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lxu7U-1cTe1p1DaG-015GiN; Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:36:13 +0100 Subject: Re: unable to build java in poudriere To: "ports@FreeBSD.org" References: <3f06805e-b236-5027-f743-8a45aac1ad52@freebsd.org> <75f47512-bbb7-d8e7-64a6-8437953b2b04@freebsd.org> Cc: Julian Elischer , Ultima , java@freebsd.org From: olli hauer Message-ID: <8ddec2b3-b961-9cf8-b447-580db6b9fd94@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 19:36:12 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:DnLiv008RSNIcnoTOcQ25geY2Ygw+zhlwDjlr26iV/UwIPyNhny xvipGGVVYNkrVpGosGUp1dzDuS3P73XI6MyA5J3yjKoVOah0laO24U32y2nxSe2pZJdloJ+ rkJpZTV9bKjlh9xLbDESyj+xyCfCwpRMGsN0wg3KuS4lq9jK+oM0SuCtBlEfC2M0hK9ps99 a+qfehvz9Bb2VRZdiOgzQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:sOeo4pv40uo=:FnqzMhYqlZGgN1DOfwxVVl SuamZ7psCoakNheP3RsfvwaWmBsppXSDiVPdkC4VmLitI1kzCOw2PEoiSi+dCg+/73T9pYJcD VONZiUER5ZjqhsML+KpFiE425xVcjhpjYfT318tdygTj8fp03ykfATlOFHdjh39JPxxBjotLl CRse20nn/hSWeh2C6yQ56SNcS8p+gnYii/fcTdv6VmGXIVBTc8KWX5HA5pK7ZzifupIerf7FN Zmk0YfBE/MjV3XxsaNaNLNMylJMaEHcMylVq/TzK9bOTqX5YRv/G3+3kgheFo2MlLeMlRc+Fc 6QW95ZXkLMeLQTp1a0BPCOqR9zW513CDLEtVn7t/OI3MX6Up07QJ4ICQ1TZNsSX0q4Fmdccd/ 976NEw1kb7vvoJ7m4PAoANR+ShDdIjNAUD1KXWz4oalD4SZzn600NHE5lkDBOpHaDg0hyfYir WP+pAZ7xcopkJznxmblTxFE9j90IVrW1asGvVT7Y3RKCDKmztpzI1f9a6kzkQBcB5z/+lk82m MDVkXfKR9tXWmKxEbhlrk5zaCgjXcKeLoKvISB3moPUw09rf7ifIg4slpwss0Ki532WBcM2a4 1GmokuE04/Tyzkps7hBqzmFURvcg9xDPxPwrgB45ygaZ1oGs8fIvxHQyPEYv3o5J+wE1FLwYY ixG7Hq1ZkP0ruyLHWxl2jok+wUXmu0/Gsg+wQC1ZTBtuE9eIo5G+9a8Z1JLQshFRstyddmeA1 9RZzkwya9V1FqYJ+YvV6D6COq7X2L8ZR97VvYB5cbQq5UAoxb5aGPd0UeYuPCIa6HqQxoVCSg HR7XDRXpnkDruLG/Fvlq7wdKac4jUoWcbkp92KkcJudTwvcDpbwCcuTZt6EAQ680WjEvRmYTQ WC1RIjnz5fMFDjZlFDx7mH27anmHAUWNDCtoiOQFAg++iLRIVV/IgeA3d9wA85T7csI8Am6wY T+iVCVKo9GNPu+C4DMznSD0OLBv8k4AOldguTw4ilLe9FrnJFIbDgyrxC3/05o8bOKnT1o3gG /m3GlxU9ZAgw7k3xXDMmmUo= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:36:25 -0000 On 2017-01-26 19:21, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 26/1/17 7:32 am, Ultima wrote: >> I just finished building openjdk8 with a fresh repo and it built just fine. >> >> poudriere bulk -p git -j 103amd64 java/openjdk8 >> ref: https://poudriere.ultimasbox.com/build.html?mastername=103amd64-git&build=2017-01-25_14h51m15s > > yeah but not so for me.. remember openjdk8 compiles just fine for me too. but only after openjdb7 is available. > did yours compile jdk7? >> >> >> >> A google search on the error suggests that it is most likely related to some form of memory issue. >> >> If you follow this post from a few years ago, it could lead you to the same conclusion. More or less it seemed to be a problem with java determining incorrect memory values which was causing that error. Could be completely wrong but it is worth looking into. >> >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java/2013-December/010441.html >> >> Explicit setting maximum memory starts the vm, but being that this is a port building, I'm not really sure what to suggest. I guess you could try add an arg on the Makefile setting max memory, but I'm not sure how much memory it requires to build. I know building openjdk does need quite a bit. Another solution, likely less desired is using another system to build it or using the FreeBSD repo to download it. Sorry if this isn't helpful. Someone else may have a better solution. >> >> Good luck, >> Ultima >> >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Julian Elischer > wrote: >> >> On 25/1/17 6:30 pm, Julian Elischer wrote: >> >> On 25/1/17 10:36 am, Ultima wrote: >> >> Sorry Julian but your details are kind of vague. Are you >> on head? I'm not sure when my last build for openjdk7 or >> 8 were but I have them built in my repo. Is there enough >> memory on the system building it? or is it limited? that >> is usually the culprit for the openjdk ports. >> >> I ask if you were on head because I know java was broken >> for sometime in January but was fixed, or at least >> r312388 is working. >> >> Sorry, one item missing.. compile is on FreeBSD 10.3 >> >> Poudriere is populated with the head ports tree as of >> yesterday, but I had hte same problem a few weeks ago. >> the list of packages includes openjdk8 >> it would probably have the same issue if openjdk8 was the >> ONLY port to make, because jdk8 wants jdk7 to jdb7 won't build. >> Should poudriere or ports give a warning "you need to >> install package X before we can do this compile"? >> >> >> I will add that bootstrap-openjdk-r351880_1.txz is already >> finished and available. >> I'm guessing that openjdk7 should be using that, but isn't for >> some reason. >> >> in fact is it possible that 8 should be using that to bootstrap >> itself up as well instead of using 7? >> >> I'm not experienced with java, I just need to get it into the >> machine image at $JOB for others to use. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Julian Elischer >> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> from he log file: (see below) >> >> This dies almost immediately. >> Do we need to prime the build with an older java? >> (e.g. the >> bootstrap pkg)? >> If so why does poudriere not do this? >> I actually want jdk8 but iti insists on building 7 >> first, which >> fails. >> Since I don't care about 7 I can prime the pump by >> downloading a >> 7 pkg but should all this be automatic somehow? >> >> Log: >> >> ######################################################################## >> >> ######################################################################## >> >> ##### Entering langtools for target(s) all ##### >> ######################################################################## >> >> >> (cd ./langtools/make && \ >> gmake >> JDK_TOPDIR=/wrkdirs/usr/ports/java/openjdk7/work/openjdk/jdk >> JDK_MAKE_SHARED_DIR=/wrkdirs/usr/ports/java/openjdk7/work/openjdk/jdk/make/common/shared >> EXTERNALSANITYCONTROL=true SOURCE_LANGUAGE_VERSION=7 >> TARGET_CLASS_VERSION=7 MILESTONE=fcs BUILD_NUMBER=b01 >> JDK_BUILD_NUMBER=b01 FULL_VERSION=1.7.0_111-b01 >> PREVIOUS_JDK_VERSION=1.6. JDK_VERSION=1.7.0_111 >> JDK_MKTG_VERSION=7 JDK_MAJOR_VERSION=1 >> JDK_MINOR_VERSION=7 >> JDK_MICRO_VERSION=0_111 PREVIOUS_MAJOR_VERSION=1 >> PREVIOUS_MINOR_VERSION=6 PREVIOUS_MICRO_VERSION= >> PAX_COMMAND=/usr/sbin/paxmark.sh PAX_COMMAND_ARGS="-vm" >> ARCH_DATA_MODEL=64 COOKED_BUILD_NUMBER=1 >> ANT_HOME="/wrkdirs/usr/ports/java/openjdk7/work/apache-ant-1.9.7" >> ALT_OUTPUTDIR=/wrkdirs/usr/ports/java/openjdk7/work/openjdk/build/bsd-amd64/langtools >> ALT_BOOTDIR=/usr/local/bootstrap-openjdk all) >> gmake[3]: Entering directory >> '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/java/openjdk7/work/openjdk/langtools/make' >> JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/bootstrap-openjdk >> ANT_OPTS=-Djava.io.tmpdir='/wrkdirs/usr/ports/java/openjdk7/work/openjdk/build/bsd-amd64/langtools/build/ant-tmp' >> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/java/openjdk7/work/apache-ant-1.9.7/bin/ant >> -diagnostics > >> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/java/openjdk7/work/openjdk/build/bsd-amd64/langtools/build/ant-diagnostics.log >> ; \ >> JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/bootstrap-openjdk >> ANT_OPTS=-Djava.io.tmpdir='/wrkdirs/usr/ports/java/openjdk7/work/openjdk/build/bsd-amd64/langtools/build/ant-tmp' >> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/java/openjdk7/work/apache-ant-1.9.7/bin/ant >> -version >> >> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/java/openjdk7/work/openjdk/build/bsd-amd64/langtools/build/ant-diagnostics.log >> Could not create the Java virtual machine. >> Could not create the Java virtual machine. >> gmake[3]: *** [Makefile:196: >> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/java/openjdk7/work/openjdk/build/bsd-amd64/langtools/build/ant-diagnostics.log] >> Error 1 >> gmake[3]: Leaving directory >> '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/java/openjdk7/work/openjdk/langtools/make' >> gmake[2]: *** [make/langtools-rules.gmk:39: >> langtools-build] Error 2 >> gmake[2]: Leaving directory >> '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/java/openjdk7/work/openjdk' >> gmake[1]: *** [Makefile:251: build_product_image] >> Error 2 >> gmake[1]: Leaving directory >> '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/java/openjdk7/work/openjdk' >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Could you check if fdescfs and procfs is mounted on the host? >From my openjdk7 buildlogs (2017-01-16): ... # pw groupmod _tss -m your_account ===> openjdk-7.111.01_3,1 depends on file: /usr/local/include/cups/cups.h - found ===> Returning to build of openjdk-7.111.01_3,1 ===> openjdk-7.111.01_3,1 depends on file: /usr/local/bootstrap-openjdk/bin/javac - not found ===> Installing existing package /packages/All/bootstrap-openjdk-r351880_1.txz [10amd64-default-job-01] Installing bootstrap-openjdk-r351880_1... [10amd64-default-job-01] `-- Installing java-zoneinfo-2016.j... [10amd64-default-job-01] `-- Extracting java-zoneinfo-2016.j: .......... done [10amd64-default-job-01] Extracting bootstrap-openjdk-r351880_1: .......... done Message from bootstrap-openjdk-r351880_1: ====================================================================== WARNING: This port only exists for bootstrapping java/openjdk[67]. You are advised to remove this port as soon as a stable JDK is built. This OpenJDK implementation requires fdescfs(5) mounted on /dev/fd and procfs(5) mounted on /proc. If you have not done it yet, please do the following: mount -t fdescfs fdesc /dev/fd mount -t procfs proc /proc