From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 19 20:17:23 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E3B1065676;
	Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:17:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.ports@mailing.thruhere.net)
Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net
	[66.230.99.27])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED34B8FC08;
	Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:17:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net
	[192.168.2.11])
	by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517E27E818;
	Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:17:22 -0900 (AKST)
From: Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.ports@mailing.thruhere.net>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org,
 Martin Wilke <miwi@freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:17:21 -0900
User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-STABLE; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; )
References: <4B15AD07.7010009@gmail.com> <20091202141902.000076d7@unknown>
	<4B167123.9020401@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B167123.9020401@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200912191117.21382.mel.flynn+fbsd.ports@mailing.thruhere.net>
Cc: Gergely CZUCZY <phoemix@harmless.hu>, Alex Dupre <ale@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] PHP 5.3
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:17:23 -0000

Hi,

sorry to jump in late..

On Wednesday 02 December 2009 04:52:35 Alex Dupre wrote:
> Gergely CZUCZY ha scritto:
> >> Oh come on. Security-wise you shouldn't hold php at all. It's about
> >> backwards incompatibility, not about security.
> 
> PHP 5.3 is not more incompatible with 5.2 than 5.2 was with 5.1 (and 5.1
> with 5.0). 5.2 branch will be dropped in near future, so I'm not going
> to maintain 80 (eighty) additional ports just for fun.

Would it be interesting to see which ports break with 5.3 and fix these or 
mark them broken before/at the same time 5.3 hits the tree?
Also, the impact of the 5.3 incompatibilities is much larger then 5.1 to 5.2, 
even though the number is similar.
-- 
Mel