From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Apr 9 23:02:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA27990 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 9 Apr 1998 23:02:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.133.7.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA27982 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 1998 23:02:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA10225; Thu, 9 Apr 1998 23:01:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199804100601.XAA10225@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: John Birrell cc: opsys@mail.webspan.net (Open Systems Networking), hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Where is the FreeBSD Mozilla CVS server? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 10 Apr 1998 15:54:18 +1000." <199804100554.PAA00602@cimlogic.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 09 Apr 1998 23:01:52 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I disagree. It is a cheap way to market FreeBSD and to show that we are good Net Citizens . Perhaps we should let the Linux camp take the lead on this one 8) Amancio > I have to disagree with this. I think it is unwise to promote things > that FreeBSD as a group hasn't done much with. And Mozilla is one > of those. > > Jordan has set up the cvs tree and it is now up to people to use it. > Or is this another one of those things that people want to play with > but nobody really wants to work on? > > -- > John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@freebsd.org > CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message