From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb  4 16:27:06 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031A0106566C
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 Feb 2011 16:27:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com)
Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net
	[207.172.157.102])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9BC8FC12
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  4 Feb 2011 16:27:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36])
	by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2011 11:27:03 -0500
Received: from mx04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (mx04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.54])
	by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AWZ71971;
	Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:27:02 -0500
Received: from 209-6-91-204.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO
	jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204])
	by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2011 11:27:02 -0500
From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <19788.10454.458608.393001@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:27:02 -0500
To: Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinmBDAbAoYNpaqcLkUFchfQ2m_T54S4=YzGXcgy@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTinCUuWET3dFVzpTRPfAiqG7hfdPJrAxY=OWVxff@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110202121446.6f6a10cd@locust.local>
	<AANLkTikuZ0b0hObp6DoL0ojDp0cu8BtpJZhetf134s-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<201102032231.54557.makc@issp.ac.ru>
	<20110203195602.GD2163@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com>
	<19787.4049.939639.870683@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
	<AANLkTinmBDAbAoYNpaqcLkUFchfQ2m_T54S4=YzGXcgy@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5  (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid
X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net)
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:27:06 -0000

Olivier Smedts writes:

>  >> =A0Am I the only person who doesn't get libreoffice via portsnap =
yet?
>  >
>  > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I built libreoffice-3.3.0 from the port on amd64 ye=
sterday.
>  > Subjectively, building seemed tyo go quicker than OO.
>  > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0After minimal testing, it appears to behave correct=
ly.
> =20
>  Just installed from ports. I had to mark it MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE on
>  my 8-core CPU because it failed randomly at different stages. I
>  also removed the configure line with number of CPUs from the
>  Makefile. Now it's OK, but with only one CPU to compile it, I did
>  not find building "quicker than OO" :)

=09I have a 4-core AMD, with neither variable set.  Once it got
through with all the new dependencies, it just ran ....
=09Beats me.


=09=09=09=09Robert Huff