From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Feb  9 01:02:38 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA09723
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 9 Feb 1996 01:02:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from casparc.ppp.net (casparc.ppp.net [194.64.12.35])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA09707
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 9 Feb 1996 01:02:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ernie by casparc.ppp.net with uucp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0tkoiP-000Hz1C; Fri, 9 Feb 96 10:02 MET
Received: by ernie.altona.hamburg.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #4)
	id m0tknp8-000010C; Fri, 9 Feb 96 09:04 MET
Message-Id: <m0tknp8-000010C@ernie.altona.hamburg.com>
From: hm@altona.hamburg.com (Hellmuth Michaelis)
Subject: Re: ISDN devices supported?
To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert)
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 09:04:54 +0100 (MET)
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199602082017.NAA08536@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Feb 8, 96 01:17:29 pm
Reply-To: hm@altona.hamburg.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>From the keyboard of Terry Lambert:

> The real answer is to disdain ISDN anyway: the reason for it is to
> allow metering charges by the Telco's, and that should be discouraged.

Can you explain this a bit ? Your view might be a bit US-centric in case
i translate the above sentence correctly ;-)

hellmuth
-- 
Hellmuth Michaelis           hm@altona.hamburg.com              Hamburg, Europe
                                              (A)bort, (R)etry, (I)nstall BSD ?