From owner-freebsd-current Sat Nov 20 1:54: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from smtp02.wxs.nl (smtp02.wxs.nl [195.121.6.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEBA14E5A for ; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 01:53:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asmodai@wxs.nl) Received: from daemon.ninth-circle.org ([195.121.197.243]) by smtp02.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 3.61) with ESMTP id AAE4ABC; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 10:53:29 +0100 Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by daemon.ninth-circle.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA41194; Sat, 20 Nov 1999 10:44:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 10:44:47 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai To: Byung Yang Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cpu name Message-ID: <19991120104447.E41154@daemon.ninth-circle.org> References: <19991119073255.A37588@daemon.ninth-circle.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i In-Reply-To: Organisation: Ninth-Circle Enterprises Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [19991120 04:01], Byung Yang (freebsd@nowcool.dhs.org) wrote: >as I see the source code, it is not doing what it is supposed to do.. any >suggestions? (it's not a big deal but still it's a bug) >I did not modify any of the source codes. I think someone else suggested lowering the optimisation level. Have you tried that yet? -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven/Asmodai asmodai(at)wxs.nl The BSD Programmer's Documentation Project Network/Security Specialist BSD: Technical excellence at its best ...in this world nothing is certain but death and taxes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message