From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Dec 20 6: 1:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.rwwa.com (ns1.rwwa.com [66.92.67.110]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5535837B405 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 06:01:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwwa.com (harvey.rwwa.com [192.124.97.11]) by ns1.rwwa.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EFE8322E; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 09:01:40 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Magnus B{ckstr|m Cc: Nevermind , FreeBSD Stable , Gunnar Flygt Subject: Re: vmware 3.0 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 20 Dec 2001 09:31:20 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 09:01:41 -0500 From: Robert Withrow Message-Id: <20011220140140.1EFE8322E@ns1.rwwa.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG b@etek.chalmers.se said: :-I'm guessing they aren't getting enough requests for a native FreeBSD :-version. (and if that's the case, they're right: There isn't a market :-for one) I think that at least part of the problem is the availability of the port that allows use of the Linux version. I've bought several licenses of the Linux version that my guys run on their FreeBSD machines. If we could convince them to track this it might be revealing to everyone. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Withrow, R.W. Withrow Associates, Swampscott MA, witr@rwwa.COM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message