Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Oct 2000 03:54:44 +0400
From:      "Oleg V. Volkov" <rover@lglobus.ru>
To:        James <j@evilcode.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: suggestion
Message-ID:  <20001018035444.A22095@fly.lglobus.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20001017163956.D68779@evilcode.com>; from j@evilcode.com on Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 04:39:56PM -0700
References:  <20001017163956.D68779@evilcode.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 04:39:56PM -0700, James wrote:
> After having edited several Makefiles for ports, and then
> having them overwritten during a cvsup, I have come up with
> a suggestion that I think many people would benefit from.
> The suggestion is to take most of the variables out of the
> Makefile that have to do with the port's configure script,
> and put them into an optional file (Makefile.opts for
> example), and have the Makefile include that file if it
> exists. Then it checks for the existance of several
> variables (like CONFIGURE_ARGS) and sets them only IF they
> aren't already set.. thus giving people the option to
> customize the options without having these customizations
> overwritten during a cvsup.
> What does everyone think of this? Would this be hard to
> implement?

There's already "Makefile.local".

--  
Oleg V. Volkov aka Rover                                       EH: CM Rover
Join Elite Imperial Fleet!                    http://www.emperorshammer.org
E-mail redirector: sr-13@mail.ru (always up)                  -=/ SR 13 /=-


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001018035444.A22095>