Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:25:00 -0800 From: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com> To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rescan causes offlined tape to reload Message-ID: <4D39C16C.7060508@feral.com> In-Reply-To: <ihcd3b$2i5p$2@hairball.ziemba.us> References: <4D38C44D.6080703@feral.com> <ihb5as$sre$1@hairball.ziemba.us> <4D39AA80.6020609@feral.com> <ihcd3b$2i5p$2@hairball.ziemba.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm a little baffled. I can't find any place in the kernel source that issues a LOAD_UNLOAD (START_STOP) with IMMED and RETEN set (0x3). What *specifiic* kernel source do you have? Is this an SVN tree? On 1/21/2011 8:43 AM, G. Paul Ziemba wrote: > mj@feral.com (Matthew Jacob) writes: > >> On 1/20/2011 9:24 PM, G. Paul Ziemba wrote: >>> .... >>> # camcontrol rescan all >>> >>> Jan 20 21:08:40 hairball kernel: (probe4:sym0:0:4:0): TEST UNIT READY. CDB: 0 0 0 0 0 0 >>> Jan 20 21:08:44 hairball kernel: (probe4:sym0:0:4:0): LOAD UNLOAD. CDB: 1b 0 0 0 3 0 >>> Jan 20 21:09:34 hairball kernel: sym0:4:control msgout: 80 6. >>> Jan 20 21:09:34 hairball kernel: (probe4:sym0:0:4:0): TEST UNIT READY. CDB: 0 0 0 0 0 0 >>> Jan 20 21:09:34 hairball kernel: (probe4:sym0:0:4:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 0 0 0 24 0 >> Okay, you've proved that the probe code is issuing this. That's wrong. >> Let me chase what has happened here. > thanks!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D39C16C.7060508>