From owner-freebsd-scsi  Thu Feb 28 13: 6:25 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Received: from freebsd.dk (fw-rl0.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.114])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5EAE137B400; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 13:06:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from sos@localhost)
	by freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1SL62U02937;
	Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:06:02 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from sos)
From: Søren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>
Message-Id: <200202282106.g1SL62U02937@freebsd.dk>
Subject: Re: Updated ATAPI/CAM patches
In-Reply-To: <1014928652.6021.5.camel@hollin.btc.adaptec.com>
To: Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:06:02 +0100 (CET)
Cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>,
	"Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org>,
	Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>,
	Thomas Quinot <thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG,
	freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG
Reply-To: sos@freebsd.dk
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94b (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-scsi.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-scsi>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-scsi>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

It seems Scott Long wrote:
> > As I have stated several times, I have no problem with ATAPI being
> > sent through CAM as long as the usual way stays (some of us cannot
> > afford the weight of those extra layers, nor loose functionality).
> > I'd do the integration somewhat differently to even further minimise 
> > the diffs, but that is really not the issue here...
> > So if we can get *serious* commitment from a committer to take up
> > these loose ends, lets talk about what to do, if not my offer stands :)
> 
> I'll raise my hand here.  I've been keenly interested in this for a
> while, since it will make my UDF work much simpler.  I'm also getting my

Hmm, your UDF code should know nothing about the lower layers, but 
we've been over that already :)

> feet wet in CAM, and I have the two CAM gurus nearby if things get too
> hairy.  I fully indend for this to be a cooperative effort with Thomas;
> I'm mainly raising my hand to take the abuse that will no doubt happen
> once in a while.

Sure, maybe we should make Thomas a committer so he could look after
it himself ? Interested ? Got the time ? I'm all ears for volounteers...

-Søren

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message