From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 26 13:38:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09EBB106564A for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:38:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8C88FC1C for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:38:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id PAA25185; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 15:38:14 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4CEFB845.8080007@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 15:38:13 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More References: <4CEE88D9.4070200@DataIX.net> <20101125200813.GA56066@icarus.home.lan> <20101125205733.GA56845@icarus.home.lan> <20101125210449.GA57788@icarus.home.lan> <20101125224455.GU2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20101125232144.GV2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kostik Belousov , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: top io mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:38:17 -0000 on 26/11/2010 02:10 Adam Vande More said the following: > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > >> What is /tmp/delete.me ? A file ? On what kind of filesystem is it >> located ? >> >> Summoning some psychic power, I can predict that delete.me is >> located on ZFS or tmpfs filesystem. Is this right ? If yes, then >> the result is expected and nothing is broken there (except ZFS, >> but I already described it). >> > > I thought I made it clear earlier in thread this was a ZFS only system, sry > for any confusion. So have you tried already the patch for ZFS as have been suggested by couple of people already? -- Andriy Gapon