From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 29 07:12:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A022416A423; Mon, 29 May 2006 07:12:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0548C43D46; Mon, 29 May 2006 07:12:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by abigail.blackend.org (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4T7CaCt004040; Mon, 29 May 2006 09:12:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by abigail.blackend.org (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k4T7CZeS004039; Mon, 29 May 2006 09:12:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marc) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 09:12:35 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Remko Lodder Message-ID: <20060529071235.GF79291@abigail.blackend.org> References: <200605281833.k4SIXQ0S080387@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060528193758.GC79291@abigail.blackend.org> <4479FE1E.8030304@FreeBSD.org> <20060529060805.GD79291@abigail.blackend.org> <46833.145.221.52.72.1148883459.squirrel@webmail.evilcoder.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46833.145.221.52.72.1148883459.squirrel@webmail.evilcoder.org> X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 07:12:38 -0000 On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 08:17:39AM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2006 08:08, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 09:46:38PM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote: > >> Marc Fonvieille wrote: > >> >On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 06:33:25PM +0000, Remko Lodder wrote: > >> >>remko 2006-05-28 18:33:25 UTC > >> >> > >> >> FreeBSD doc repository > >> >> > >> >> Modified files: > >> >> en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks chapter.sgml > >> >> Log: > >> >> Update the DVD-RAM section a bit. This avoids the usage of > >> "you", "we" > >> >> and things like that, which is consistent with the rest of the > >> >> documention. > >> >> > >> >[...] > >> > > >> >Using grep on chapter.sgml gives about 250 "you" and 35 "we" > >> >(in the related section: 29 "you" and 8 "we"); I think there's a > >> >confusion with the use of "I" or other familiar wordings. > >> > > >> >You changed the active voice of "You have to enable DMA access for > >> ATAPI > >> >devices, this can be done in adding the following line to the > >> >/boot/loader.conf file:" to the passive voice, Ok[1] but you have to > >> >also change the same sentence which appears at the beginning of a > >> >previous subsection (17.7.2) to be really consistent. > >> > > >> >Marc > >> > > >> >[1] Many persons think the passive voice should be replaced with > >> active > >> >voice, but no one is really affirmative on this point, an > >> interesting > >> >point of view can be found at http://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20060316/ > >> >(dds@ blog). > >> > >> OK, i am fine with boths ways (although you can see my preference > >> with this commit): do you think we can workout something for doc@ > >> so that we have a guideline or something? The one thing that I do > >> want to have is having documents being consistent with eachother in > >> the way they address people etc. > > > > As I previously said there were 2 instances of the same sentence on > > that > > page. I just wonder why you changed one and not the other since you > > stated you did it for consistency. > > > > Marc > > > > I only changed it there because i was actively translating that part > and saw the text, and we tend to only change things when you are > working on it anyway. So there's a problem in your commit log: -- Update the DVD-RAM section a bit. This avoids the usage of "you", "we" and things like that, which is consistent with the rest of the documention." -- Where's the consistency when you do not even check the rest of the page? You are also stating there's a convention about the non-use of "you" and "we", where's that "guideline" in the FDP? To sum up you said "that wording is not good", so you change the wording but you do not change the same wording 20 lines above, and you use "consistency with the rest of the documentation" as reason of your change. If you want to be consistent, please be consistent. I'm not against the change, I'm against the fact you do not really think twice before changing a thing. > But this is not helping us in the discussion > about why I did what. Lets rather talk about how we can go on with this > in such a way that it will be clear for anyone to follow. > It would be great for the doc set that everyone tries to apply this logic before any commit. Thanks. Marc