Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 21:44:45 +0100 From: Andreas Tobler <andreast-list@fgznet.ch> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, sunpoet@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Segfault in _Unwind_* code called from pthread_exit Message-ID: <f4f921b6-7801-904e-03a3-b515f1c8a152@fgznet.ch> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.21.1711052126150.4053@anthias.pfeifer.com> References: <20170824180830.199885b0@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20170825173851.09116ddc@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20170825234442.GO1700@kib.kiev.ua> <20170826202813.1240a1ef@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20170826184034.GR1700@kib.kiev.ua> <20171029182351.502f53cf@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20171029191358.GU2566@kib.kiev.ua> <9a724da4-70f1-4330-9a77-619739008a14@fgznet.ch> <20171030153207.15a42a1e@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <9468430e-fda4-10f4-b6a0-aa40d7d64f5b@fgznet.ch> <20171031092803.GA2566@kib.kiev.ua> <9619a1f8-bb42-abc9-a4ee-3b93192f365e@fgznet.ch> <alpine.LSU.2.21.1710312234210.5916@anthias.pfeifer.com> <a54bfe87-e5ce-00ff-67e7-99a5abc52b73@fgznet.ch> <20171101121100.5ca84da3@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <alpine.LSU.2.21.1711011358211.5916@anthias.pfeifer.com> <e7ca8d66-043b-3016-86cb-29dbce97df8c@fgznet.ch> <alpine.LSU.2.21.1711052126150.4053@anthias.pfeifer.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05.11.17 21:31, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sun, 5 Nov 2017, Andreas Tobler wrote: >> Pushed on all active branches, 8/7/6. > > Saw that, thank you. Very well done, Andreas! > > I should have gcc8-devel updated in the next 24 hours, gcc7-devel > and gcc6-devel over the week as new snapshots are released. Cool thx! >> If you could do the gcc* branches, yes please. > > Once the respective -devel ports are updated, I'll take care of > the corresponding stable ports. Patch available if you want. (applicable to all gcc* ports, 5-8) >> I got one request to have the patch also in gcc5 > > Let's see. First I want to address the five newer ports, then > possibly this one (though gcc5 is hardly used). Sure, but I can understand comment #13 of the pr mentioned. Even if hardly used, consistency is always good :) Andreas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f4f921b6-7801-904e-03a3-b515f1c8a152>