From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar  5 20:03:01 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8517016A420
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun,  5 Mar 2006 20:03:01 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk)
Received: from mail-gw0.york.ac.uk (mail-gw0.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.245])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F52F43D45
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun,  5 Mar 2006 20:03:00 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk)
Received: from ury.york.ac.uk (ury.york.ac.uk [144.32.108.81])
	by mail-gw0.york.ac.uk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k25K1l5b008948; 
	Sun, 5 Mar 2006 20:01:47 GMT
Received: from ury.york.ac.uk (localhost.york.ac.uk [127.0.0.1])
	by ury.york.ac.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k25K1lpj089217;
	Sun, 5 Mar 2006 20:01:47 GMT
	(envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk)
Received: from localhost (gavin@localhost)
	by ury.york.ac.uk (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id k25K1Vpl089207; 
	Sun, 5 Mar 2006 20:01:31 GMT
	(envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk)
X-Authentication-Warning: ury.york.ac.uk: gavin owned process doing -bs
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 20:01:31 +0000 (GMT)
From: Gavin Atkinson <gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk>
X-X-Sender: gavin@ury.york.ac.uk
To: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su>
In-Reply-To: <20060224183435.GA66559@comp.chem.msu.su>
Message-ID: <20060305200015.I89137@ury.york.ac.uk>
References: <200602211455.01731.root@solink.ru>
	<06022119291516.78019@www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw>
	<1140606294.59408.8.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk>
	<20060224183435.GA66559@comp.chem.msu.su>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-York-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-York-MailScanner-From: gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk
Cc: Bachilo Dmitry <root@solink.ru>, stable@freebsd.org,
	Tai-hwa Liang <avatar@mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw>
Subject: Re: mount_smbfs trouble after cvsup
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 20:03:01 -0000

On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Yar Tikhiy wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:04:54AM +0000, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
>> Is there a reason this change was made?  And is there a reason why
>
> The change wasn't against NETSMBCRYPTO, it just corrected the way
> kernel modules get their options.
>
>> NETSMBCRYPTO is not in GENERIC?  To me, it seems that breaking smbfs
>> between releases within 6.x violates POLA... I suspect a large number of
>> people (myself included) have always used smbfs for passworded shares
>> and it's "just worked".
>
> This issue is under investigation by the Release Engineers and yours
> truly.  I'm sorry my change to the kernel module framework caused
> the confusion, but so the whole issue has got attention at last.
> Of course, it must be fixed before 6.1-R.  In the meanwhile, I'd
> like to hear about any reservations on making NETSMBCRYPTO the
> default case for netsmb/smbfs.  Thanks!

I don't see any problem with making it the default case, since before the 
framework cleanup, it effectively was default.

Gavin