From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Sat Dec 26 21:18:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03EFD4C2CB7 for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 21:18:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D3Gr76M0Xz4jWT; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 21:18:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:db4c::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B41552BB94; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 21:18:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2DC94E30A4; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 22:18:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 22:18:10 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Kristof Provost Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libifconfig non-private in 13? Message-ID: <20201226211810.g4ll4ow23fitmxdo@ivaldir.net> References: <1EB6D7ED-F370-42EA-AC66-93D8BC96F29C@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm6htsiovo47qbq2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1EB6D7ED-F370-42EA-AC66-93D8BC96F29C@FreeBSD.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 21:18:16 -0000 --sm6htsiovo47qbq2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 09:02:00PM +0100, Kristof Provost wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Libifconfig was marked as private (and experimental) back in 2016. > It=E2=80=99s since made some strides and has grown a few users. Ifconfig = now depends > on it as well. >=20 > While it=E2=80=99s far from finished it=E2=80=99d be more useful for some= users if it were > public. That would at least imply some level of API/ABI stability, which = is > why I=E2=80=99m bringing it up here before pulling the trigger. >=20 > Does anyone see any reasons to not do this? >=20 I would go the otherway around, any reason to make it public yet? if yes th= ey go ahead, if no keep it private ;) Best regards, Bapt --sm6htsiovo47qbq2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAl/nqIwACgkQY4mL3PG3 PlqoCw//Yq6e3y/Jueiw8dFFbVyD7LhJ7uwRezp5P0ylpcHEo46mD9Wv6JBgK1vo BXFJOYZo3f1JBnguoQiF7EcJMFgV6dC3PDyFmkS67YcPuFXPRlLYV42GgZX1+Grc 0Hulb2TRatk5j2QTAubD//E9a1vZ0KO5Tm/ooudnxN9TIXd/rZzdLVGbhWuyGohv fgMWAGXO8zIgnvzO5rb7lfKTQieoMn+TB/umDM2Dt63T05abMKgMpj34nlcjMfG1 coiuqFcDqZfZSwz5yo2XitrNc7r80S2BMTs6yycHkZWA/A/PDjNCB3+wN6kufXFS l7DZbWs9NKERNNtxCeBvEMrL+5QlFQYwFteNnPw0ArzQvTm6kHEAstQhgs7wkG42 OjzqZda1m2JfDqn424jv2lJjM/0A+pRyK3yaZIlb7kqag+nrG3x2+mkpYzPHDyKF bIno0Ub/HtuUzHL5EzLaIxxnsxn/ef0QIeVQVkQ5fStvfzCD8YQEOjlgX8qJipm8 YsdkbkQoNxH5HgNIKoNJaxVy0bWIVcxNU4znTcYpLO0wbtloYKbvtxxEezyrV75/ ddLLCzbKDoy/9CoOEJLeA+b1btdE1tIl4LXfxzwRxZT3dflIT7qG9mSlkZtq1p+Z CKPbAWnDXWVqr7VL/zn+chrP4TXN2IlgReY6eM3y3RtFG7zQMBY= =2ToE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm6htsiovo47qbq2--