From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 7 20:08:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C965A16A407; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 20:08:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from penny@bangj.com) Received: from jj.bangj.com (jj.bangj.com [24.106.203.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3783A43CAA; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 20:07:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from penny@bangj.com) Received: from [24.106.203.86] (dj1.bangj.com [24.106.203.86]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by jj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6782B855; Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:08:12 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <8589451A-1799-448E-B269-57727EB8F71B@bangj.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Doug Penny Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 15:08:13 -0500 To: clsung@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: trac-0.10.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:08:13 -0000 We are running into a fairly annoying bug in trac 0.10.2 that has been fixed in 0.10-stable. Would it be possible for the port to be upgraded to include these patches? Our issues are with ticket #4132. They can be seen here: http://trac.edgewall.org/milestone/0.10.3 Thank you, Doug Penny