From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 18 14:01:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89343106566C for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:01:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc3-s5.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s5.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FC68FC22 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:01:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP176 ([65.55.116.73]) by blu0-omc3-s5.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 18 Sep 2011 07:01:29 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [76.182.105.57] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.105.57]) by BLU0-SMTP176.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 18 Sep 2011 07:01:28 -0700 Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3S1sTM34xnz2CG4h for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 10:01:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 10:01:26 -0400 From: Carmel To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4E75DE55.7080206@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4E75DE55.7080206@infracaninophile.co.uk> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Sep 2011 14:01:28.0455 (UTC) FILETIME=[76129970:01CC760B] Subject: Re: Version of "opencv-core-2.3.1" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:01:30 -0000 On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:04:37 +0100 Matthew Seaman articulated: > If you wait for a few hours and re-csup it should be fixed. AFAIK, I > don't think this affects portsnap because it generates the INDEX in a > different way. Or you can create your own INDEX if you want. Thanks Mathew for you info. I am using "portsnap" so apparently it does exhibit this behavior. I any case, since it is apparently not a critical problem I will just ignore it for now. -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com