From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May  6 10:03:11 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 82F0237B401; Tue,  6 May 2003 10:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8130E43FB1; Tue,  6 May 2003 10:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h46H38Lr055615;
	Tue, 6 May 2003 19:03:08 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 06 May 2003 18:56:12 +0200."
             <xzpu1c8f1zn.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> 
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 19:03:08 +0200
Message-ID: <55614.1052240588@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: buildworld b?rkedinlibpam 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 17:03:11 -0000

In message <xzpu1c8f1zn.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
>"David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> writes:
>> I am seeing this on more than one machine also (in fact it is preventing
>> the Alpha 5.1 BETA snapshot from being built).
>> I have CVSup'ed and 'cvs up'ed many times.
>
>Am I correct in guessing that those are all systems that previously
>didn't have Kerberos, but are building it now that the knob has been
>inverted?

I never have given any options pro or contra kerberos, so that sounds
likely.

>Do those systems have *complete* and *clean* source trees, including
>the Kerberos sources?

Yes.

I'll start a make universe again and we can see what happens...

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.