From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 24 23:36:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAE6106566B for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:36:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from cpoproxy2-pub.bluehost.com (cpoproxy2-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.39.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E9FF8FC14 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19347 invoked by uid 0); 24 Feb 2011 23:36:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by cpoproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 24 Feb 2011 23:36:52 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=WyhovKA6EBSk436rPrBCb7WUJ73eQZStpZboDXiiF+yM9Dowx+mqnkhGsMA6DSKGo3HqOGOG5JqxXi7/6bxPZmn3hJ0CwW5/pFWEHjvK3j5EbSatTF+hbDFeTkdbufci; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kukaburra.hydra) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pskjr-0003o3-Hu for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:36:52 -0700 Received: by kukaburra.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:26:06 -0700 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:26:06 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <20110224232606.GA13888@guilt.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <20110224234044.0df661c1.freebsd@edvax.de> <20110224225425.GB13490@guilt.hydra> <20110225001301.e4f6d95f.freebsd@edvax.de> <21929_1298589484_4D66E72C_21929_309_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499BD35499F@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <20110224233204.GI1983@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110224233204.GI1983@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: Backtick versus $() X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:36:53 -0000 --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:32:04PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote: > Quoth Gary Gatten on Thursday, 24 February 2011: > > > > Everyone is wrong! "pfmsh" is the best at everything, period. It > > does everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow. It > > doesn't require any upgrades, ever. It's 100% secure. It doesn't > > use any memory or other resources, $hit, it doesn't even need to be > > installed; it just "magically" works. > >=20 > > There you have it. >=20 > That one doesn't seem to be in ports. In case you aren't just being sarcastic, I think "pfmsh" is a reference to "pure fucking magic shell". --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk1m6Q4ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKURdwCgr0UtQnDKAlz4HP2Oi6vIRdxJ PwAAn2c52kLcFQ+r0uzdsj4FFTevHrb2 =1cHa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH--