From owner-p4-projects  Fri May 10  9:18:49 2002
Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767)
	id 8485037B401; Fri, 10 May 2002 09:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org
Received: from smtp.enternet.hu (smtp.enternet.hu [62.112.192.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8D4CF37B403; Fri, 10 May 2002 09:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elischer.org (3e70d2af.dialin.enternet.hu [62.112.210.175])
	by smtp.enternet.hu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g4AGGXr51050;
	Fri, 10 May 2002 18:16:33 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Message-ID: <3CDBF27F.76C5AE0E@elischer.org>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 09:17:03 -0700
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386)
X-Accept-Language: en, hu
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jonathan Mini <mini@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 11012 for review
References: <200205081533.g48FX3q20811@freefall.freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <p4-projects.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20p4-projects>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20p4-projects>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Jonathan Mini wrote:
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~peter/p4db/chv.cgi?CH=11012
> 
> Change 11012 by mini@mini_stylus on 2002/05/08 08:32:05
> 
>         - pass thread's instead of proc's to CURSIG() and issignal()
>         - mark a thread TDS_UNQUEUED when blocking it while its parent
>           handles its signal (via ptrace(2)).
> 
>         This make gdb work properly again, and fixed ptrace(2) on normal
>         processes.

This will probably mean that what we have is capable of almost being committed.
You and jhb said that the thread allocator could be rewritten using the new 
uma mechanisms. if that is done, then we could check in what we have 
minus some changes that are dependent on comments from others..

(I think DES would like to have a go at the ptrace changes)

Is the system stable with only non KSE processes?

If we could generate good diffs it would help
others to look and comment.

julian


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe p4-projects" in the body of the message