From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 27 16:24:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84EEBA43 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (unknown [IPv6:2602:d1:b4d6:e600:4261:86ff:fef6:aa2a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A8FCE1C for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9RGPLZq021399; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:25:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: David Wolfskill , Alban Hertroys , freebsd-stable , Kevin Oberman In-Reply-To: References: <6978A7BF-3CB7-4088-904D-5A60D755A04C@gmail.com> <20141025113846.GY1235@albert.catwhisker.org>, From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: Dump time issues Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:25:21 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <6bb4cda435fb420fb663fa1d47b85a08@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:24:11 -0000 On Sat, 25 Oct 2014 11:26:44 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 4:38 AM, David Wolfskill > wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 01:26:43PM +0200, Alban Hertroys wrote: > > > I?m seeing something odd in my dump output that I didn?t notice before: > > > > > > Dumping /root... > > > DUMP: WARNING: should use -L when dumping live read-write filesystems! > > > > (That, by the way, is pretty good advice in my experience.) > > > > As long as the volume is not SU+J. Then, in my experience, it's very bad > advice. This reminds me of a question that I've been meaning to ask for some time now; Why is the FreeBSD install media using SU+J by default? While I understand Journaling reduces retrieve times, which makes it all seem more responsive. IMHO the consequences, and limitations it imposes, seem to outweigh the pro's. Just wondering... --Chris > -- > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"