Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Sep 2019 08:35:55 +0200
From:      Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
To:        "@lbutlr" <kremels@kreme.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: How to tell what users Ruby
Message-ID:  <20190930083555.f2c77ad6.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <DDA21055-CC9C-4E1F-9B8A-0756F5AD89F7@kreme.com>
References:  <ED82496B44D510B8171582DB@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <20190929082601.9152a485.freebsd@edvax.de> <D370CB1D9A8CFB71A5E257D7@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <20190930043339.f6d30c68.freebsd@edvax.de> <DDA21055-CC9C-4E1F-9B8A-0756F5AD89F7@kreme.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 23:37:52 -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
> On Sep 29, 2019, at 8:33 PM, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote:
> > I've just installed portmaster for testing - you're right, it does not
> > show up as depending on ruby; vim, however, does:
> > 
> > 	# pkg info -r ruby
> > 	ruby-2.5.5_2,1:
> > 	        vim-8.1.1439
> 
> Depends on how you built vim, I suppose. Ruby is not a dependency on my systems.

Surely possible. I installed it via pkg, so the default options
should have been applied by FreeBSD's automatic build system.



> > Interesting thing: portmaster's Makefile does not mention ruby at all.
> > So I tried something: I removed ruby and vim and portmaster, then
> > installed portmaster again - and no ruby. So my guess is: portmaster
> > does no longer depend on ruby.
> 
> I don’t think postmaster ever depended on ruby?

I'm not sure, but I _think_ that it actually depended on it
in the past... of course that's nothing to be entirely sure
of, as I've been a portupgrade person before entirely switching
to pkg / poudriere (and only occassional "make install"). ;-)






-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190930083555.f2c77ad6.freebsd>