From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Tue Dec 5 15:46:45 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9F6E6E3CF; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 15:46:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from devin@shxd.cx) Received: from shxd.cx (mail.shxd.cx [64.201.244.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A8167FA4A; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 15:46:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from devin@shxd.cx) Received: from [64.201.244.132] (port=54633 helo=[10.0.0.109]) by shxd.cx with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1eMFQX-000MHT-1z; Tue, 05 Dec 2017 15:46:33 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: svn commit: r326554 - in head: . usr.bin/sponge usr.bin/sponge/tests usr.bin/tee From: Devin Teske X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13G36) In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 07:46:43 -0800 Cc: Eitan Adler , src-committers , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8090FD05-E35B-4BC2-A89C-281EE8EBAA0B@shxd.cx> References: <201712050355.vB53tApl074041@repo.freebsd.org> To: cem@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 15:46:45 -0000 > On Dec 4, 2017, at 8:40 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote: >=20 >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >>> Author: eadler >>> Date: Tue Dec 5 03:55:10 2017 >>> New Revision: 326554 >>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/326554 >>>=20 >>> Log: >>> sponge(1): initial commit >>>=20 >>> sponge(1) is a utility that reads input until >>> complete, then opens the output file, then >>> writes to it. This makes it useful in pipelines >>> that read and write to the same file. >>>=20 >>> Reviewed by: wblock, jilles, imp, cem, danfe (all: various iterations)= >>=20 >> I don't recall reviewing this in any iteration, but I could be mistaken. >>=20 >> Best, >> Conrad >=20 > In fact I don't think any of the listed reviewers approved the change, > at least in phabricator. The "Reviewed by" line signifies not just > giving feedback, but approval of the final (or near-final) change. >=20 > Best, > Conrad >=20 If true, upsetting. You have people like myself that are ultra patient and w= ait for the approvals. For example, https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10006 which= has been in review for 8 months now and I have been working on it for a tot= al of 5 years now. It is more than a little hurtful to put in such effort and then see someone e= lse run roughshod past the group. --=20 Devin=