From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Aug 27 17:46:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E425837B423; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 17:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zeppo.feral.com (IDENT:mjacob@zeppo [192.67.166.71]) by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA20614; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 17:44:52 -0700 Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 17:41:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Garance A Drosihn Cc: Jordan Hubbard , Wes Peters , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , Darren Reed , freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Integration of Net/OpenBSD code (was Re: your mail) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Okay, I'll vote for PPC, based on nothing more than I have some G3 > and G4 powermacs (both at home and here at work). I'll admit that > isn't much of a market analysis... :-) As a side FYI- NetBSD also runs on the G4. So does YellowDog Linux. I just made sure the Qlogic driver I have runs on the latter on a G4 (it does). I have some pending patches for NetBSD in this area too. This is one snappy little sucker- really *nice* mechanicals. But in terms of what FreeBSD ought to port to for both it's current and future customers? That's a stretch. The Apple folks might like us, but the sparc server market is much more important. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message