From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 26 18:07:57 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47AB5106566B
	for <ruby@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:07:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (cl-414.sto-01.se.sixxs.net
	[IPv6:2001:16d8:ff00:19d::2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62C58FC08
	for <ruby@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:07:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.78.158.180] (unknown [166.205.138.221])
	by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C1348FC2B;
	Sun, 26 Dec 2010 21:07:47 +0300 (MSK)
References: <4D177040.6020209@logvinov.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D177040.6020209@logvinov.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8C148)
Message-Id: <D92027F1-3383-48C5-B8BA-A16C2CDCF801@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8C148)
From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 10:07:32 -0800
To: Alexander Logvinov <avl@logvinov.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: "ruby@freebsd.org" <ruby@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: RAKE_BIN and ruby19
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions <freebsd-ruby.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ruby-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:07:57 -0000


On Dec 26, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Alexander Logvinov <avl@logvinov.com> wrote:

> Hi!
>=20
> It seems this a typo:
>=20
> --- bsd.ruby.mk    22 Nov 2010 05:47:07 -0000    1.203
> +++ bsd.ruby.mk    26 Dec 2010 16:32:33 -0000
> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@
> .if ${RUBY_VER} =3D=3D 1.8
> RAKE_BIN=3D    ${LOCALBASE}/bin/rake
> .else
> -RAKE_BIN=3D    ${GEM_LIB_DIR}/bin/rake${RUBY_VER:S/.//}
> +RAKE_BIN=3D    ${LOCALBASE}/bin/rake${RUBY_VER:S/.//}
> .endif
> .endif
>=20
> Also it can be:
>=20
> --- bsd.ruby.mk    22 Nov 2010 05:47:07 -0000    1.203
> +++ bsd.ruby.mk    26 Dec 2010 16:34:47 -0000
> @@ -547,11 +547,11 @@
> .endif
>=20
> .if defined(USE_RAKE)
> -BUILD_DEPENDS+=3D        ${LOCALBASE}/bin/rake:${PORTSDIR}/devel/rubygem-=
rake
> .if ${RUBY_VER} =3D=3D 1.8
> RAKE_BIN=3D    ${LOCALBASE}/bin/rake
> +BUILD_DEPENDS+=3D    ${RAKE_BIN}:${PORTSDIR}/devel/rubygem-rake
> .else
> -RAKE_BIN=3D    ${GEM_LIB_DIR}/bin/rake${RUBY_VER:S/.//}
> +RAKE_BIN=3D    ${LOCALBASE}/bin/rake${RUBY_VER:S/.//}
> .endif
> .endif
>=20
This change was made because we had problems with old version of rake
bundled with ruby 1.9.  That's why we made it to always install rake, even
for 1.9.  Or was it rubygem?
Why this is a promlem in any case?  It seems that this path should point
to the right rake location for 1.9.

--
Stanislav Sedov
ST4096-RIPE=