Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 11:16:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is it time yet? [was Re: Weak symbols] Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000822105455.8956A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20000822083335.C38787@hamlet.nectar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 08:46:44PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > When we want to (someday) build libpthread, it will have to be linkable > > with libc. > > So I'll admit that I'm not ready to tackle this problem, as I don't > fully understand it. But perhaps we should burn that bridge when we get > to it. If I understand correctly, than implementing weak aliases in > libc today will not hinder a libpthread, i.e. the same issues will > need to be dealt with whether libc remains as is or we add weak aliases. > > Correct me if I am being shortsighted or if I have this wrong. I think this is basically correct. -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.1000822105455.8956A-100000>