From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 9 16:17:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA25523 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 16:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from odin.visigenic.com (odin.visigenic.com [204.179.98.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA25515 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 16:17:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from VSI48 (vsi48.visigenic.com [206.64.15.185]) by odin.visigenic.com (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with SMTP id AAA9668 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 16:17:20 -0700 Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970409161623.00a51ca0@visigenic.com> X-Sender: toneil@visigenic.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Wed, 09 Apr 1997 16:16:24 -0700 To: questions@freebsd.org From: "Tim Oneil" Subject: Re: Tyan P-Pro S1668 and 64Meg SIMMS? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Let me relate a little experience I had with a Tyan dual cpu board. I was only using one cpu. (Intel pentium pro 166) I had a parity error too. At first I thought it was becuase I was using plain, or "486" simms, with parity. Maybe th' chip(s) were bad (a pair of 32 meggers). So I went down and dropped the extra cash for a pair of 32 meg EDO simms. Same problem. Scratched my head, grabbed a spare pentium mb from my closet, and I had no problems. Took the tyan back and replaced it with an iwill p55TV. Go figure. I wanted to use that Tyan too. At 12:22 PM 4/9/97 -1000, you wrote: >Has anyone had any experience with 64Meg 16x36 SIMMS in a >Single CPU Tyan Pentium Pro ATX S1668 motherboard?