From owner-freebsd-hardware  Tue Aug 20 19:06:37 1996
Return-Path: owner-hardware
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA26310
          for hardware-outgoing; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 19:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hogw2.att.com (hogw2.att.com [204.179.186.34])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA26301
          for <freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 19:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aloft by hoig2.att.att.com (SMI-8.6/EMS-1.2 sol2)
	id WAA06028; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 22:00:56 -0400
Received: from stargazer (stargazer.cnet.att.com) by aloft (4.1/DCS-aloft-M5.1)
	id AA23026; Tue, 20 Aug 96 22:04:22 EDT
Received: by stargazer (4.1/DCS-aloft_client-S2.1)
	id AA12263; Tue, 20 Aug 96 22:04:20 EDT
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 96 22:04:20 EDT
From: gtc@aloft.att.com (gary.corcoran)
Message-Id: <9608210204.AA12263@stargazer>
To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au
Subject: Re: ASUS SC200 SCSI card? (PCI interrupts)
Cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.org
Sender: owner-hardware@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


>PCI interrupts are lettered (INTA, INTB, INTC, INTD), not numbered, and
>that INTA on one slot is _NOT_ connected to INTA on any other slot.

Is the non-connection between same-letter PCI interrupts in different
slots only on good (versatile) motherboards, or is that part of the
PCI spec?   I was under the impression that at least _some_ MBs shared
their PCI interrupts...?

Gary