From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Mar 11 14:22: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED0B37BA9B for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 14:21:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA05842; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 14:22:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Bill Fumerola Cc: Ted Sikora , "freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD dead ? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 11 Mar 2000 16:06:00 EST." <20000311160600.H25438@jade.chc-chimes.com> Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 14:22:26 -0800 Message-ID: <5839.952813346@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > me..). WC/BSDI could take away the bandwidth. WC/BSDI could take away the > hosting of servers, there are a ton of people with servers and bandwidth > that would take over exactly what hub/freefall/bento/etc do right now. The > USWest machines are living proof of that. > > I'd even venture to say that Jordan (and core) already have contingent plans > for such a "disaster". We have more than contingency plans - we're seriously investigating moving everything to a co-location facility at this point purely for bandwidth reasons. As much as we've sincerely appreciated its use all these years, from a connectivity perspective Walnut Creek CDROM's T1 connection simply sucks. :-) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message